Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label Dover Beach. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dover Beach. Show all posts

Saturday, 10 April 2010

Work and play

We set about laying out and tidying the downstairs dining room, corralling tat, stacking and storing, mopping the marble floor before laying a carpet to go beneath table and chairs. I cut extra shelves to go on the book shelf we’d recovered from the roadside, now sanded, filled, painted and screwed to the wall; pruning and rearranging the wisteria; mending the climbing frames for that and the bougainvillea; digging out rubble from the floor of the apothiki as a base for more plaka under the veranda; cutting and storing more firewood.
Jacinta dropped by “There are lots of wooden doors and windows by the bins on the lower road.” We drive down with tape measure, and ease into our little car a pair of white painted doors and two windows in their frames – one set just what we need for the dining room dresser front, once part of its present recess is chipped away to fit the frame as square as we can make it. The work gives time to savour words on the acute difficulty of translating Homer, which I came across in a scruffy old book [The Writers of Greece and Rome, Gilbert Norwood & J.Wight Duff London:Oxford University Press 1925] I got for €2 from a table-top sale in Ypsos. ‘Greek is more flexible than English, possesses a vastly larger proportion of long melodious words, is retarded far less by the clotting of consonants.’ wrote Gilbert Norwood, Professor of Greek at University College, Cardiff...
...Moreover in the hexameter Homer employs a measure native to Greek, and capable of lightness and speed as well as dignity. The result is that, whenever he wishes, he can be amazingly rapid and elastic and yet – here is the difficulty of English – without becoming glib and trivial. The greatest poetry in our tongue, not only Paradise Lost but the comparatively agile verse of the balcony-scene in Romeo and Juliet, is necessarily slower – in Milton immensely slower – than Homeric poetry.
Norwood can speak of Homer’s two defects though. ‘First there is a lack of humour… (an absence only noticeable because on the rare occasion he tries it, his humour flatly fails e.g. when Glaucus and Diomedes exchange
armour, vi.234-6)). Whenever Homer mentions laughter, it is laughter at something pitiable, helpless, wicked or mean. The other defect is the illogical expansion of minor passages’ - elaboration that interrupts rather than enriching the story. I know what he means, but I wonder if such longeurs occurred in recitals when the audience wanted an interval, or if the story-teller, at a feast, meant to stoke tension; have listeners murmuring “get on with it!” Norwood was writing in the 1920s. We've learned that Homer being recited in public used adjectives to held the rhythm rather than describe the noun. Rappers use the same technique.
After the dining room Lin argued that we postpone, for the moment, hopes for a new stairway and balcony on the side of the house, and repair and protect the one we have, filling between planks with foam, sanding flat the place from which we first enjoyed a view of nearly all Corfu, the Kerkyra sea, Albania and mainland Greece. Then with this job on hold, awaiting a choice of surfacing, Lin turns to completing the plaka jigsaw of the garden.
I’m reading Jim Potts' just-published book The Ionians Islands and Epirus, to be launched in the Friends’ Room at the Hellenic Centre in London at 7.15pm on 4th May under the auspices of the Ionian Society and Signal Books (free entry but confirm attendance on +44 20 7563 9835 or press@helleniccentre.org). The book plug refers to a 'mosaic'. It’s more a most readable stream of highly educated consciousness from someone married to a Corfiot - Maria Strani - speaking Greek, who’s known the Ionian islands and Epirus and the rest of Greece for over forty years, with miles to go before he sleeps.
Potts' commentary is, at last, the book I couldn’t get in bookshops in Corfu, where one proprietor, when I asked about a 'proper' history of Corfu, told me I must go the university for "that kind of detail." Potts modestly quotes the many good histories preceding his, but most are untranslated or slipping out of date, and none deal with the controversies of the last sixty years – the present moral landscape of the area and the rest of Greece and indeed all us xenos who have so invented, fetishized and commodified the place. Seldom was Wildes’ phrase geographically truer - ‘each man kills the thing he loves’. I shall revert to this book which so skillfully bridges the gap between a thesis rich with indexed reference and a guidebook for the visiting traveler and resident alike. Jim Potts' sensibility reminds me of my stepfather's intentionally unpublished ode to 'the book I never wrote' which included the words ‘They claim the sun that used to bake the hay. And breathe the breeze in which the pointing dog caught a hundred scents. They walk out in trainers and T-shirts that say “Save the Rain Forest”. “Stand back!” they say. “We have a right to walk where we please!” But we look where they trod before and shudder for what follows in their footsteps. I said I must write a warning. But I was angry and - as the Japanese say - to be angry is only to make yourself ridiculous. So we will live out our days in the cracks between the concrete. And then they will pour cement on top of us.'
Jim Potts' book is no threnody. He finishes with a seventh chapter on ‘New Perspectives’ which includes such concerns for the commons – as access to places for the disabled, potholes filled to save the lives of people on cycles and scooters, the value of re-binding the Ionian Islands by restoring reliable and frequent sea ferry services between them instead of thinking only of road and air transport to and from the mainland, and - writing from a male perspective - respect for women and the memory of their oppression, as well as the deconstruction of narratives that have outlived their uses, yet which, in our mingled mongrel world, still fuel futile animosities. Potts knows that for all the grieving we do about despoiled landscape, practical solutions, resolutions and reconciliations begin in the landscapes of our imagination. Matthew Arnold said it at the end of Dover Beach
Ah love, let us be true to one another! for the world, which seems to lie before us like a land of dreams, so various, so beautiful, so new hath really neither joy, nor love, nor light, nor certitude, nor peace, nor help for pain...
Potts' most controversial thrusts are questions, gentle but accurate, not accusations, even his strongest reproaches – illustrated by diatribes from other writers, visitors and residents, foreigners and natives – are conditional, based on charitable understanding of the frailties – including the greed for excess pleasure that runs through our nature, the blind march of ignorant armies. He ends by quoting the hopes and dreams of Greeks, friends, wives, husbands, brothers and sisters, hosts and guests convoyed to Ithaka under the escort of painters, musicians, the designers of school curricula, writers and poets- Cavafy’s lines:
Ἒτσι ποῦ τὴ ζωή σου ρήμαξες εδῶ
στὴν κώχη τούτη τὴν μικρή, σ’ ὄλην τὴν γὴ τὴν χάλαδες
(Last lines of The City: 'Just as you've wasted your life here, in this tiny niche, in the entire world you've ruined it.' ) I know a secret about Jim Potts. I met him for coffee and mezés on the Liston at Zisimos at the end of January. He’s as sure as scholarship allows of threads connecting classical and modern Greece; not the forged links of propaganda and government schoolbooks, kitsch monuments and municipal pageants, viewed as duplicitous and burdensome among many Greeks, but something subtler, too elusive for politics; a form that dissolves before it enters the liminal, like déjà vu. As he disposes myths, he corrects ancient misquotes (that famous one ‘beware of Greeks bearing gifts’ is mistranslated from a caution to a prejudice ‘beware of Greeks even when they bear gifts’) and deconstructs without ridicule a host of over-cherished stories. Over my coffee and his chocolate he said "I've been quite controversial, I think."(Hilary Paipeti's review in the April Corfiot)

Saturday, 12 May 2007

How to write a letter

Perhaps there's no substitute for leafing through a family album alone or with someone close, but I do like scrolling through the years on my laptop. Thinking of the new life on Friday I ran through old images and found I'd got a composite of family pictures strewn around my screen showing Albania's Karaburan Peninsular, jumping between now and 1944. [A click on the image hyperlinks to a larger version] I discovered how to capture the contents - at any one moment - of my screen. Click on an image. Up comes PREVIEW on the toolbar, then FILE>GRAB>TIMED SCREEN. A tiny white pie appears and turns clockwise blue. What was on my screen becomes a JPG image in its own right. Wow - new toy! There's me in Greece last September - white haired bloke snapped by Lin. There's me with the same glower with mum long ago snapped by dad; me with her and dad, born of their brief wartime marriage, and me at 10 with jackdaw Jim - a collector, like me, of unconsidered trifles. There's my son with his grandma 40 years after that snap of her with me, and another with his mother 20 years ago snapped by me, and as background (but better viewed by clicking on the title of today's blog - 'snapping and clicking') the view of the Albanian coast on a morning in February this year - land and sea giving themselves to jollity. (Amy's keen to use screen capture to play a trick on her mum - capturing her actual 'desktop' and turning it into an image of her desktop - so when she clicks on a file she wants, 50% of them won't budge. Ha ha ha! Plato would have liked this one "forget about my cave analogy for the fallibility of human perception, imagine a trick played by a daughter on her mother on a computer screen!")
[Those destitute of philosophy are like bound prisoners in a cave, only able to look at a wall in front of them. A fire behind them throws their shadows and the shadows of objects behind them on the wall. Regarding these as real, they have no notion of the objects to which they are due.]
Last week I got 'NetFuture #169' - an e-mail circular I've been ignoring - with passages from Steve Talbott's 'Devices of the Soul: Battling for Our Selves in an Age of Machines'. 'Does nature rejoice in the morning?' I prepared to delete a sermon but read on. The essay explored feelings habitually relegated to the divine - though he doesn't mention this. I'm prone to attributing feelings that are mine to my surroundings. Wordsworth entranced me: THERE was a time when meadow, grove, and stream, The earth, and every common sight, To me did seem Apparell'd in celestial light,... ...I hear the echoes through the mountains throng. The winds come to me from the fields of sleep, And all the earth is gay; Land and sea Give themselves up to jollity, And with the heart of May Doth every beast keep holiday I love that poem but Arnold's Dover Beach is also a favourite: '... for the world, which seems to lie before us like a land of dreams, so various, so beautiful, so new, hath really neither joy, nor love, nor light, nor certitude, nor peace, nor help for pain.' [Back to the future: yet...] Every now and then I have moments of joy in ordinary places - a very busy loving God, utterly careless of my clumsy attempts to be rid of him, sending a witty reminder that He knows where I live. I don't reject these experiences. Quite the opposite. I'm very lucky to have them, but when I look for secular explanation, ancient language engulfs me. '... if I make my bed in hell, thou art there. If I take the wings of the morning, and dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea; even there shall thy hand lead me, and thy right hand shall hold me.' I'm consoled by such prose, concreted over by new translation. I've seen the sun leap from the sea many times; seen the waves jocund; seen them glower under leaden clouds dreading the unwelcome moment the sun leaves us to darkness. Talbott conjectures gently about such sensations, quite free of defensive rebuttal. The web's so useful for pulling up lines I can't recall. To find the exact lines - 'and we are here as on a darkling plain swept with confused alarms of struggle and flight where ignorant armies clash by night' - without a search engine I'd have had to go upstairs, find 'Dover Beach' in the Oxford Book of English Verse and transcribe - a chore compared to cut and paste.
Only the other day someone asked me to send them a 'letter'. To make one of these you write with a pen on a piece of paper, fold it - the paper not the pen (I'll explain that later) - put it in a - what d'you call it - an envelopethingy - on which you write an address - much longer than an e-mail. Then you get a small square of gummed paper, lick it, stick it - honestly - and ... this 'stamp' goes on a corner of the envelope. It's how you pay for the service. The wierdest thing is that when you have sealed the envelope - more lick - you go out into the street - seriously - holding the letter in its envelope with an address and stamp and you walk up the road until you find a round red box - a pillar box - on the pavement with the Queen's initials on it - E II R - (some have previous monarch's initials on them - G V R, G VI R even VR - being in some cases over 100 years old - the R for regina or rex) and a slot near the top. No really! It's true, my dear great grandchildren of the future. You put the envelope in the slot. It disappears. Then, and this is the true magic of the process, this same envelope with your actual writing, even your lingering aroma, saliva and finger prints, was slipped - most of the time - through another slot in someone else's home a day or two later - having been intercepted in the interim and a 'frank' placed over the stamp, so's it can't be reused. Can you believe that? This is what the pillar box looked like with an envelope being put into it. The stamp is in the foreground. "OK little know-it-alls, so you've got one on your vegetable garden as a bird box." [I shared thoughts with Steve Talbott on what he'd written. He replied: Simon. I could hardly have received a more satisfying note than the one you have so kindly sent me. I would only question your characterization of yourself as an atheist. I suspect you are rather an areligionist - not a bad thing to be, in my book! Many many thanks for your beautiful words. Steve stevet@oreilly.com NetFuture editor: http://www.netfuture.org]
 * * *
 George Seferis on Poros wrote “Life is so beautiful that if Homer had not been blind he would have written nothing.” I must register this. There are things I need to see. Films - one about Seferis but also one about Maria's first husband, Yiannis Moralis. George Seferis, presumably when he was Greek Ambassador, lived for a time in Sloane Avenue where Dad and Maria lived for part of the 1950s and Dorothy in the early 1960s. Next time I'm cycling through I'll look out for the poet's blue plaque.

Back numbers

Simon Baddeley